Connected incident and risk control
Keep hazards, incidents, risk assessments and follow-up actions connected to accountable owners.
Near-miss guide
A practical ClariDuty guide to simple reporting, triage, investigation, learning and action tracking. Keep ownership, evidence, actions and review history connected without replacing competent legal or technical judgement.
Keep hazards, incidents, risk assessments and follow-up actions connected to accountable owners.
Retain evidence with actions and use verification before closure where appropriate.
Give central teams oversight while preserving site-level ownership and role-based access.
Connect competence, equipment and operational inspection records to the wider assurance picture.
Record the applicable process, location, people and evidence needed for simple reporting, triage, investigation, learning and action tracking.
Record findings or required controls, attach supporting evidence and assign accountable owners with realistic deadlines.
Track progress, verify completion where appropriate and preserve the audit trail rather than overwriting the original record.
ClariDuty is designed to keep findings, ownership, evidence, verification and audit history connected so teams do not have to reconstruct the compliance story from separate spreadsheets, inboxes and folders.
ClariDuty 365 offers subscription options for single-site and multi-site organisations. Current pricing and buying guidance should be confirmed on the live pricing page before purchase.
Only evidence mapped to currently working product behaviour is listed here.
Explore the connected controls that support the same audit trail, ownership and evidence model.
A useful approach should cover simple reporting, triage, investigation, learning and action tracking, with clear ownership, evidence, review dates and corrective action where gaps are found.
ClariDuty can structure the records, evidence, actions, reminders and review history around the workflow while responsible people retain accountability for competent and legal decisions.
No. Software supports control, consistency and evidence. Competent people remain responsible for legal interpretation, technical decisions, approvals and statutory duties.