One operational control layer
Connect incidents, inspections, risks, actions, training, assets and documents rather than managing them in separate silos.
DSEAR guide
A practical ClariDuty guide to dangerous substances, hazardous areas, controls, actions and review. Keep ownership, evidence, actions and review history connected without replacing competent legal or technical judgement.
Connect incidents, inspections, risks, actions, training, assets and documents rather than managing them in separate silos.
Keep access and accountability aligned with organisations, sites and user roles.
Surface overdue work and assurance status across locations.
Retain the records needed to understand what happened, what changed and how an action was closed.
Record the applicable process, location, people and evidence needed for dangerous substances, hazardous areas, controls, actions and review.
Record findings or required controls, attach supporting evidence and assign accountable owners with realistic deadlines.
Track progress, verify completion where appropriate and preserve the audit trail rather than overwriting the original record.
ClariDuty is designed to keep findings, ownership, evidence, verification and audit history connected so teams do not have to reconstruct the compliance story from separate spreadsheets, inboxes and folders.
ClariDuty 365 offers subscription options for single-site and multi-site organisations. Current pricing and buying guidance should be confirmed on the live pricing page before purchase.
Only evidence mapped to currently working product behaviour is listed here.
Explore the connected controls that support the same audit trail, ownership and evidence model.
A useful approach should cover dangerous substances, hazardous areas, controls, actions and review, with clear ownership, evidence, review dates and corrective action where gaps are found.
ClariDuty can structure the records, evidence, actions, reminders and review history around the workflow while responsible people retain accountability for competent and legal decisions.
No. Software supports control, consistency and evidence. Competent people remain responsible for legal interpretation, technical decisions, approvals and statutory duties.