Food-safety workflows
Manage HACCP, checks, traceability, allergens and food-assurance evidence alongside wider compliance.
HACCP checklist
A practical ClariDuty guide to plan review, CCPs, monitoring, deviations, verification and records. Keep ownership, evidence, actions and review history connected without replacing competent legal or technical judgement.
Manage HACCP, checks, traceability, allergens and food-assurance evidence alongside wider compliance.
Link food-safety findings to owners, evidence and verification rather than treating them as isolated tasks.
Keep supplier, lot, production and finished-product relationships available for investigation and recall exercises.
Retain the evidence trail behind findings, actions and food-safety controls for later review.
Record the applicable process, location, people and evidence needed for plan review, CCPs, monitoring, deviations, verification and records.
Record findings or required controls, attach supporting evidence and assign accountable owners with realistic deadlines.
Track progress, verify completion where appropriate and preserve the audit trail rather than overwriting the original record.
ClariDuty is designed to keep findings, ownership, evidence, verification and audit history connected so teams do not have to reconstruct the compliance story from separate spreadsheets, inboxes and folders.
ClariDuty 365 offers subscription options for single-site and multi-site organisations. Current pricing and buying guidance should be confirmed on the live pricing page before purchase.
Only evidence mapped to currently working product behaviour is listed here.
Explore the connected controls that support the same audit trail, ownership and evidence model.
A useful approach should cover plan review, CCPs, monitoring, deviations, verification and records, with clear ownership, evidence, review dates and corrective action where gaps are found.
ClariDuty can structure the records, evidence, actions, reminders and review history around the workflow while responsible people retain accountability for competent and legal decisions.
No. Software supports control, consistency and evidence. Competent people remain responsible for legal interpretation, technical decisions, approvals and statutory duties.