RAMS software UK
RAMS management and checking software
Structure method statements, risk controls, contractor evidence and competent-person approval.
Built for the people accountable for the outcome
Why better control is needed
RAMS often fail because task sequence, interfaces, controls or supporting evidence are incomplete.
Operational workflow
From the first signal to controlled evidence
- 1Define scope, boundaries and the safe work sequence
- 2Identify hazards, interfaces and people at risk
- 3Specify controls, competence, permits and emergency arrangements
- 4Attach supporting evidence and submit the revision
- 5Require competent-person review, correction or approval
Connected compliance workflow
Keep related records together
See ClariDuty in practice
Product behaviour you can test in a working demonstration
Structured completeness review
The checker highlights missing content and control conflicts without claiming legal approval.
Controlled revisions
Rejected submissions can be corrected while preserving review comments and history.
Competent approval
Automated assistance never replaces the authorised human decision.
Frequently asked questions
What does RAMS mean?
Risk assessments and method statements explaining hazards, controls and safe work sequence.
Can AI approve RAMS?
No. Automated checks may identify omissions; competent people assess suitability.
What evidence may be required?
Training, insurance, inspections, SDS, permits, drawings and emergency arrangements.
Can rejected RAMS be resubmitted?
A controlled workflow can retain comments, revisions and approval history.