RAMS software UK

RAMS management and checking software

Built for the people accountable for the outcome

Contractor managersFacilities and engineering teamsProject managersCompetent RAMS reviewers

Why better control is needed

RAMS often fail because task sequence, interfaces, controls or supporting evidence are incomplete.

Operational workflow

From the first signal to controlled evidence

  1. 1Define scope, boundaries and the safe work sequence
  2. 2Identify hazards, interfaces and people at risk
  3. 3Specify controls, competence, permits and emergency arrangements
  4. 4Attach supporting evidence and submit the revision
  5. 5Require competent-person review, correction or approval

Connected compliance workflow

Keep related records together

Risk assessments and method statementsContractors and competencePermits and controlled workAssets, sites and evidenceActions and audit history

See ClariDuty in practice

Product behaviour you can test in a working demonstration

Structured completeness review

The checker highlights missing content and control conflicts without claiming legal approval.

Controlled revisions

Rejected submissions can be corrected while preserving review comments and history.

Competent approval

Automated assistance never replaces the authorised human decision.

Buying guidance without hidden assumptions

Use one representative high-risk task to configure the review standard, evidence requirements and approval roles. Subscription scope is confirmed before purchase.

Frequently asked questions

What does RAMS mean?

Risk assessments and method statements explaining hazards, controls and safe work sequence.

Can AI approve RAMS?

No. Automated checks may identify omissions; competent people assess suitability.

What evidence may be required?

Training, insurance, inspections, SDS, permits, drawings and emergency arrangements.

Can rejected RAMS be resubmitted?

A controlled workflow can retain comments, revisions and approval history.